Thoughts in a given moment

Inchoate ramblings that just might go somewhere.

An overlooked gift and a healing bomb June 12, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — yharlap @ 7:18 pm
Tags: , ,

I am riding a wave these last few days, being tossed between anxiety and contentment. At this very moment I’m sitting in a dirty little vegetarian restaurant waiting for a friend, and up until about two minutes ago I was fretting, still about the group I’m facilitating. Then, all of a sudden, right next to where my heart is in my chest, I felt a quick swelling up of joy. Nothing’s different than it was a few minutes ago — the issues I’m trying to untangle are still there — I still have a nagging little burden of worry hovering over me — but there’s also pleasure. The sun is warm. Commercial Drive, my favorite part of town, is teeming with people. I biked all the way here from work, and FAST — with a pit stop at the public library to pick up a book on cycling the Pacific Coast, to help us plan our weeklong trip through Washington State in July. Even though I have lots of work to do this weekend to prepare for Monday, and I feel overburdened and a little shackled by how much work I’ve taken on at my job, and I have three plans for this weekend that I don’t really want, despite despite despite all that, I’m free.

The stuff that is troubling me took a new little turn today. Every twist of this story is walloping me in a new way, and I suddenly realized why: it is too similar to a situation that I’ve been in before. In that situation I was one of the two participants embroiled in the conflict, and it was traumatizing to both of us, and to a few innocent bystanders who got caught up in it along the way. I have given it a lot of thought over the year, have come to understand my culpability on multiple levels in that situation, and I assumed I had finished coming to terms with it. But now I see almost the exact same dynamic — totally different situation — playing out in front of me, and this time I can make facilitation choices that could potentially diffuse, remedy — or exacerbate the situation, and I feel powerless, like I’m standing just an inch off the path of a great rolling inevitability.

I was told, the other day, by one of the participants, that at a particular moment she would have liked to see stronger facilitation, that she thought I should have intervened. She would have liked a ‘healing bomb.’ And at the time she made that comment, I wasn’t sure how I could have really intervened in a way that could have helped. I mean, I tried to intervene by entering the conversation and supporting her by agreeing with her comments. That didn’t work; it just sucked me into the discussion, and at that point I lost my potential to change the dynamic because I tacitly agreed to enter it. Now I see, I could have said, “X’s statement wasn’t a blaming; it was a gift.”

It wasn’t blaming; it was a gift. She was angered by the situation but held herself aside, held no one responsible, and chose to give us a gift by going meta, making an astute comment about the nature of the discussion that no one else in the room had noticed (or at least, I doubt they had noticed it), and connected it to her past experience. It was wisdom.

It provoked a defensive reaction. I stayed within the constraints of the discussion, kept engaging with the person who got defensive. To no end, and I knew, even as I batted the ideas around with that person, that it was pointless, that no learning would come out of it, but I didn’t have the wherewithall to extricate myself.

“It was a gift. Let’s just think about the gift we’ve just been given, end this particular conversation, and move on to something else.”

 

Fault lines and facilitation June 10, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — yharlap @ 7:16 pm
Tags: , , ,

This morning I’m still ruminating on the fault lines running underneath the surface of the group that I’ve been facilitating.  Funny that this weekend I was thinking, “I love my job!” and now I’m thinking, “My job causes me a lot of stress!”

Yesterday morning on my bike ride to work I decided that to honour the humanizing impulse I had to address the tensions I was feeling directly, and not to smooth them over and ignore them. I started the day with a check-in, and I started the check-in by addressing my goal to serve a humanizing impulse in all my actions, and to do that I think it requires addressing group tensions – but that by bringing them up, there’s also a danger of doing damage. And indeed: my approach helped some and alienated others. So, I continue to manage fallout, and continue to ruminate.

How do you learn from a ‘learning moment’? This is the same challenge I skirted around when I was asked that by another group I facilitated, because as much as I can say, ‘reflect!’ and ‘connect!’, ultimately that’s unsatisfying. There are no strategies or tools to whip out. It takes having sensitive feelers and then being skillful, and there are so few role models out there of soft and skillful handling of conflict – I have so seldom seen that in action – that we all have to make it up as we go along, and just… get better at it, I hope.

“Fail. Fail again. Fail better.”

The only other thought I have is that I don’t have a good distraction today to get me off ruminating about the group situation. Happily, I have a break from facilitating until Monday. And as I was riding my bike to work today, I realized that to best serve the humanizing impulse right now I need to take care of myself. So I stopped for a bagel and lemonade, even though I’m going to be a little late to a meeting. I’m almost done sipping my lemonade.

 

Being true to the work & group conflict June 8, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — yharlap @ 9:49 pm
Tags: , , ,

I’m still chewing on the events of the day. I facilitated the first day of a new program. Interesting, thoughtful small group of participants, not without some internal stresses and tensions. A good challenge for me, but not 100% pleasant.

I’ve been thinking this evening about how to negotiate the tensions so that we don’t just glide over them, acknowledging them in private asides but ignoring them in the group. I am rather conflict-averse, so I get stressed out when I’m responsible for leading a group through tension that has the potential to erupt into full-blown conflict. But that’s my job, in this case, so I’ve been thinking about how to do that.

I don’t have the answer yet — maybe it will float to me through sleep, or maybe it will seem clearer after I’ve slept, since I certainly could use a solid night of rest — but just as I was brushing my teeth and readying for bed I started wondering, “What would I do if I followed a humanizing impulse in the moment of tension in the group?” And I don’t quite know what I would do, but I know that I would not ignore it. The move to humanize that moment would involve welcoming in the discomfort and the conflict because that’s a part of the human experience, and it is definitely a part of this group’s experience, and to deny that shuts down the full humanity of the group. Which is sad, but especially so when the purpose of the group is tied to humanizing education (though that isn’t the language we’re using).

I want to do that, be true to the humanizing impulse, but also do it softly, skillfully, so that no one is damaged in the process. That’s the scary challenge: that I might not be skillful enough to navigate the group through discomfort without creating damage. But it’s my job.